Pediatric Fellowship Directors Meeting
Meeting Minutes
Society of Critical Care Medicine
January 30, 2003
San Antonio, TX
Attendees:
Angela
Slaucettier Rich
Brilli
Mary Lieh-Lai Ken
Banasiak
B. Craig
Weldon Amy
Hardin
Margaret
Winkler Emily
Dobyns
Tony
Slonim Ken
Tegtmeyer
Denise
Goodman Charlie
Schleien
Vinay
Nadkarni Deborah
Lupez
Michael
Ushay Madolin
Witte
Steve
Kernie Tom
Rice
Brad
Peterson John
Downie
Mona
McPherson Michele
Mariscalco
Michele
Moss Stephanie
Storgion
Mohan
Mysore
The
meeting was called to order at 7am. The minutes from the previous meeting were
unanimously approved.
1.
Match Issue/Results:
a.
Spreadsheet attached to
minutes showing results
A motion was made by Jeff Burns, M.D. and seconded by
Michele Mariscalco, M.D. that the match continues. This was unanimously
approved
b. There will be an on-line survey for
fellows regarding the match and other issues in training.
c. Career choice of those taking the 2000 Critical
Care Medicine Board Exam: 94/145
are full-time academic and 18/145 practice full-time.
d. A discussion was held on AMG vs. IMG issues. IMG's in
2001 accounted for approximately 1/3 of all positions and each year this is
important as visa issues have changed. It was recommended that IMG trainees
have sufficient number of years left on their J1 visa prior to beginning
training in critical care medicine,
and that they not leave the country during the time of their training as
visa rules seem to be in a time of change and they may encounter circumstances
that would not allow them to return.
e. The gender ratio of trainees is now matching that in
pediatrics, with the 2001-2002 male to female ratio 52:48%
2.
Online PICU Course:
Mohan Mysore, M.D. and Ken Tegtmeyer (www.picucourse.org)
a.
This
site is a very active and an on-line exam is up and running. Each site has its
own administrator. There will be additional 1-2 exams by the end of this
summer. The administrative support of this project will shift to the Society.
However, the content and other issues will remain in the hands of the resident
education committee in the pediatric section.
3.
Evidence-based Medicine
Journal Club
a.
A
multi-use license from iSILO for trainees is available. Contact Barry Markovitz for information
on how to do this.
4.
ACGME Work Force Issues
a.
A
long discussion ensued regarding how different programs are addressing this
with fellows, and in looking at the role of physician extenders and their
interactions with fellows as ways to perhaps make this work. It was also
discussed that not everyone agrees as to how the 80-hour work - week really
reflects what we do in practice.
b.
Two
examples were given: Columbia has gone to 7:00 a.m. conferences for residents,
but not for fellows, and fellows who are going off call tend to miss afternoon
conferences; whereas, Cornell will bring trainees back for educational
experiences.
c.
Chicago
is using fellows on a day/night type of cycle and finding some success with
this.
d.
Since
New York has been under state regulation for a while, it was suggested that we
look to programs in New York as a model to develop educational strategies.
e.
It
was felt that program directors should share their successes and failures for
meeting these workforce strategies so that everyone doesn't need to reinvent
the wheel.
5.
Competencies: Michele
Mariscalco
a.
Programs
that had recently gone through the ACGME RRC site review gave suggestions
including nurse evaluation of fellows, and linking teaching tools to specific
outcomes. Good faith participation
of the workforce initiative seemed to be a major issue for these site reviews.
Evaluation process is important and they look very closely at how often people
actually sit down with their fellows and discuss issues.
b.
It
was recommended highly that there be a paper trail of exit interviews during
these reviews. It was recommended that there be documentation of procedural
competencies and post-graduate inquiry was suggested asking fellows once they
have finished, what they thought of the training program that they had competed
c.
Some
of the competencies might include procedures, how well they were performed, and
associated complications.
d.
It
was recommended that our fellowship director committee develop 2-3 bullet items
under each core competencies, so that we could continue to develop these
competencies.
6.
Recruiting and Retention
Issues:
a.
It
was felt that we need to get a better handle on fellows who resign from
training programs after the first or second year and those who complete their
training, but either don't practice critical care medicine after training or
have a very short time in practice. We also had further discussions of IMG
issues as mentioned above.
b.
Board
requirements were again pointed out, suggesting that there may be changes;
however, none have been made yet.
7.
Portrayal of Pediatric
Critical Care Medicine as a Career
a.
It
was felt that we need to look at our selves, look at our lifestyles and try to
project a positive image as to what life is like as a pediatric intensivist. It
was felt that we need bring the fellows into the loop of the value of critical
care medicine as we try to recruit younger physicians into our specialty
8.
Chair Position
a.
The
chair position will be open next year. We are seeking nominations for this
upcoming election. Please contact
Stephanie Storgion, Michele Moss or Rich Brilli if you are or know of a
fellowship director who would be interested in serving in this position.
There
being no further business the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully
submitted;
Stephanie
A. Storgion, M.D.
Chairperson,
Pediatric Fellowship Directors
|
PCCM Match Statistics |
2002 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Programs |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Positions |
265 |
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programs |
46 (1withdrew) |
47 (1withdrew) |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Programs Filled |
20 (43%) |
28 (60%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfilled |
26 (57%) |
19 (40%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positions Filled |
52 (63%) |
60 (67%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfilled |
31 (37%) |
29 (33%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicants Registered |
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withdrawn |
19 (no ROL) |
9+6 (no ROL) = 15 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Active |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matched |
52 (91%) |
60 (94%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unmatched |
5 (9%) |
4 (6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programs Not In Match |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Univ. of Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Jefferson-DuPont |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Univ. of Cleveland/Case Western - Rainbow Babies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapel Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jewish Health Center |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UMDJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa |
||||||||