... over 361 reviews and counting...Background and GoalsThe practice of health care - and pediatric critical care is no exception - cannot be accused of being systematic and consistent when it comes to determining diagnoses, prognoses, or therapies. Why we do what we do for our patients often stems from a hodgepodge of our education, intuition, and experience. Perhaps too frequently we rely upon the opinions of experts and not enough upon critical analysis of the medical literature.There is a growing movement in health care, broadly known as evidence-based medicine, that simply suggests we use the best evidence available in our medical decision making. Ideally, this evidence will come from appropriately designed clinical trials of sufficient rigor and statistical power that enable extrapolation of results with confidence to our patients. We have no shortage of important clinical questions, ranging from issues like the appropriateness of regular central venous catheter changes to the efficacy of high-frequency ventilation in hypoxemic respiratory failure. Many such issues have been approached with clinical trials published in a variety of peer-reviewed medical journals. The ability of such investigations to adequately answer these pressing questions varies greatly. How do we find out about such reports, and more importantly, how do we properly evaluate them? The PedsCCM Evidence-Based Journal Club hopes to help by regular publication of critical reviews of clinical trials pertinent to the practice of pediatric critical care. The goals of this publication are:
Operational IssuesThe PedsCCM Evidence-Based Journal Club will present critical reviews of clinical trials based upon The User's Guide to Medical Literature, from McMaster University's Evidence-Based Medicine Informatics Project (now available from The Canadian Centres for Health Evidence). These reviews will take full advantage of hypertext links to this excellent resource on evidence-based medicine, as well as links both locally and around the Internet to provide appropriate background on the methodology and statistical issues raised. Each review will be peer-reviewed by two of the PedsCCM EB Journal Club editorsPapers will be categorized as trials relating to: (links are to the User's Guide series)
And some studies may be best appraised using the following:
How to ParticipateAs with all of PedsCCM, the Evidence-Based Journal Club is intended to be a fully collaborative project. Readers are strongly encouraged to participate in one of the following ways:
Chief Editors
Co-editors:
How to cite a review in the PedsCCM EB Journal Club (in a manuscript, cv, etc)
|
| PedsCCM.org founded 1995 Questions or comments? |